0

Reviews and word of mouth come up trumps

Posted by User Imageadi on Oct 23, 2008 in The world of the web

I wrote on Tuesday about the importance of reviews and word of mouth after a survey came out in support of email to communicate with the younger market out there.  Lo and behold today has seen a study by Rubicon Consulting bestowing the virtue of reviews and word of mouth in your marketing campaigns.  Some of the key findings of the study were:

  • The Web is the #2 resource for customer support information, after user manuals. It ranks ahead of calling the manufacturer or asking a dealer.
  • Website categories that get the most daily usage are search, social communities like MySpace and Facebook, general news websites like CNN.com and NYTimes.com, and online banking.
  • The websites that Americans value most are (in order), Google, Yahoo, YouTube, Wikipedia, and Facebook. Although Yahoo’s financial challenges have generated a lot of press attention, it continues to have a very large and loyal following.
  • Young people (age 22 and under) are much noisier online than their elders. They account for about half of all the content and comments posted online.
  • Facebook appears to be ahead of MySpace in terms of number of users in the US, and perceived value of the site.
  • Despite extensive publicity, the community sites SecondLife and Twitter reach only a few percent of US Internet users.
  • Democrats are more active online than Republicans. Democrats are more likely to participate in online communities, and say they are more heavily influenced in their voting decisions by information they find online.

Of course to do well in these areas requires both an excellent product and a good deal of time and effort to liase with the communities in your industry.  Unfortunately many marketers want a short cut when interacting with communities and cannot resist spamming at the first opportunity.  The following steps are a good start for those wishing to use communities as part of their marketing strategy.

1) Lurk, work out how things are done.
2) Respond to posts, share knowledge.
3) Start posts on topics of interest.
4) Discuss with the admin/owner any way that you can help them.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Rate this:
2.8 (3 people)

Tags: , , , , , ,

 
5

Can football scouting be crowd sourced?

Posted by User Imageadi on Oct 23, 2008 in The world of the web
The future for Real Madrid?

Image by sanofi2498 via Flickr

There was an interesting piece in TechCrunch today about a new service being launched out of Israel called IMScouting.  From the IMScouting site:

“IMScouting collects in-depth data on 48 leagues in more than 40 countries with a total coverage of over 40,000 professional footballers. The data is collected using a network of 40 “correspondents”—football experts situated locally in European, African and Latin American countries that IMScouting employs to report data back to the mothership. Propriety crawlers are also used, but to a lesser degree. In-house experts—journalists, ex-players and other football experts—review the data to ensure reliability before it’s made public.”

Sounds like a decent service and with super scout Pini Zihavi behind it must have a strong attraction for clubs around the world. The free version has some basic information on each player, including their size and season stats.  Nice to have it all in one place but nothing that couldn’t be found out by searching the web.  The premium version provides some more meat with contract details provided and more detailed search functions.

I’ve long thought however about whether clubs could make use of crowdsourcing to find out about players.  Crowdsourcing in football came to the fore recently with the MyFootballClub venture by William Brooks whereby fans bought and run a small English football team.

Before that however the popular Football Manager computer game has long relied upon volunteers from around the world to provide the statistics for each player, and the game often proves remarkably accurate in predicting the abilities of players, especially those young players looking to hit the big time.  So why can’t clubs do something similar?

The bigger clubs have millions of fans around the world, many of whom will have decent knowledge of their local leagues and the players within them.  Football Manager has shown that the software to input this kind of information isn’t too hard to construct.  Clubs could even pay people that first highlight a player that then goes on and becomes a player for the club.  Obviously things like contract details might be harder to come by for the layman but nevertheless it would be interesting to see how fruitful such a project could be.

Football fans are unique in the support they give their team so I’m sure it would get plenty of interest and crowd sourcing could provide clubs with an awful lot of insight from the collective brains of their fan base, not to mention tightening the bond between club and supporters.Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Rate this:
3.0 (5 people)

Tags: , , , ,

Copyright © 2012 Adi Gaskell says… All rights reserved. Theme by Laptop Geek.