<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Google in danger of following the Microsoft path?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/</link>
	<description>By a community manager, for community managers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:36:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi Gaskell</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-32281</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi Gaskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 04:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-32281</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Former Supreme Court nominee believes Google are not comparable to Microsoft. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57527134-38/robert-bork-on-antitrust-google-is-no-microsoft/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57527134-38/rob...&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Former Supreme Court nominee believes Google are not comparable to Microsoft.<br />
  <a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57527134-38/robert-bork-on-antitrust-google-is-no-microsoft/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57527134-38/rob" rel="nofollow">http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57527134-38/rob</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Facebook to revamp its search engine? &#124; Adi Gaskell says...</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-29510</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook to revamp its search engine? &#124; Adi Gaskell says...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 10:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-29510</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the aim of taking the social networking crown from Facebook.&#160; The move hasn&#039;t been without controversy, with the European Union investigating the company after activity on Google+ was found to influence [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the aim of taking the social networking crown from Facebook.&nbsp; The move hasn&#039;t been without controversy, with the European Union investigating the company after activity on Google+ was found to influence [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi Gaskell</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-27558</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi Gaskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-27558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New comScore data shows that users spend just a few minutes per month on Google+, compared to around 8 hours per month on Facebook. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204653604577249341403742390.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204...&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New comScore data shows that users spend just a few minutes per month on Google+, compared to around 8 hours per month on Facebook.<br />
  <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204653604577249341403742390.html" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204" rel="nofollow">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Payton</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-25797</link>
		<dc:creator>Payton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 08:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-25797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amazing write-up! This could aid plenty of people find out more about this particular issue. Are you keen to integrate video clips coupled with these? It would absolutely help out. Your conclusion was spot on and thanks to you; I probably won’t have to describe everything to my pals. I can simply direct them here! ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing write-up! This could aid plenty of people find out more about this particular issue. Are you keen to integrate video clips coupled with these? It would absolutely help out. Your conclusion was spot on and thanks to you; I probably won’t have to describe everything to my pals. I can simply direct them here! </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickBlack01</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-24918</link>
		<dc:creator>NickBlack01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 16:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-24918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm indeed.  You&#039;d have to think the EU are fairly confident of getting a win here if they&#039;re willing to go after such a big company so publicly. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm indeed.  You&#039;d have to think the EU are fairly confident of getting a win here if they&#039;re willing to go after such a big company so publicly. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adi Gaskell</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-24890</link>
		<dc:creator>Adi Gaskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 09:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-24890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, will be interesting to see how this develops. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/8727-google-could-face-eu-antitrust-action-by-april&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/8727-google-could...&lt;/a&gt; ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, will be interesting to see how this develops.<br />
  <a href="http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/8727-google-could-face-eu-antitrust-action-by-april" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/8727-google-could" rel="nofollow">http://econsultancy.com/uk/blog/8727-google-could</a>&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adigaskell</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-24141</link>
		<dc:creator>adigaskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-24141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good find Wes.  It is very shaky ground Google are on imo. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good find Wes.  It is very shaky ground Google are on imo. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-24140</link>
		<dc:creator>Wes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 10:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-24140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google could face legal ramifications over its decision to exclude Facebook and Twitter from its social-search system, some experts say. There&#039;s no law specifically saying Google has to include other companies&#039; social signals, but by favoring its own products, Google leaves itself open to an antitrust challenge, Jeff Roberts writes. &quot;Google may have fueled another wave of paranoia and regulatory attention,&quot; he writes. 
  &lt;a href=&quot;http://paidcontent.org/article/419-is-it-legal-for-google-to-shut-competitors-out-of-social-search/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://paidcontent.org/article/419-is-it-legal-fo...&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google could face legal ramifications over its decision to exclude Facebook and Twitter from its social-search system, some experts say. There&#039;s no law specifically saying Google has to include other companies&#039; social signals, but by favoring its own products, Google leaves itself open to an antitrust challenge, Jeff Roberts writes. &quot;Google may have fueled another wave of paranoia and regulatory attention,&quot; he writes.<br />
  <a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-is-it-legal-for-google-to-shut-competitors-out-of-social-search/" rel="nofollow"></a><a href="http://paidcontent.org/article/419-is-it-legal-fo" rel="nofollow">http://paidcontent.org/article/419-is-it-legal-fo</a>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adigaskell</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-21665</link>
		<dc:creator>adigaskell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-21665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are social networks a perfect market though?  I&#039;d say they&#039;re probably the least free of all websites because you invest so much more into your presence on your site of choice.  If I want to shop somewhere else then it&#039;s as easy as taking my credit card elsewhere.  If I want to network somewhere else though I have to move my profile over + build up my network on that site.  That is a pretty significant means of locking someone in, even if in a fairly soft way. 
 
Metcalfe&#039;s Law doesn&#039;t apply as written  &lt;a href=&quot;http://(http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/12/08/why-metcalfes-law-does-not-apply-to-online-communities/)&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;(http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/12/08/why-metcalfes-law-does-not-apply-to-online-communities/)&lt;/a&gt; but the network effect is still powerful if people are well connected and engaged.  That&#039;s the battle G+ will face imo because people left MySpace for Facebook because they weren&#039;t happy at MySpace so that motivated them to go to all that effort.  Right now I&#039;m not sure people are very unhappy with Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn et al.  The only reason people are using G+ is that they don&#039;t want to miss out. 
 
The interesting point will be how desperate Google get if that situation continues.  You&#039;d have to think after they&#039;ve ditched Wave and Buzz that if G+ were to fall that&#039;d be the end of their adventures into social.  They&#039;re just not gonna let this one wither away. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are social networks a perfect market though?  I&#039;d say they&#039;re probably the least free of all websites because you invest so much more into your presence on your site of choice.  If I want to shop somewhere else then it&#039;s as easy as taking my credit card elsewhere.  If I want to network somewhere else though I have to move my profile over + build up my network on that site.  That is a pretty significant means of locking someone in, even if in a fairly soft way. </p>
<p>Metcalfe&#039;s Law doesn&#039;t apply as written  <a href="http://(http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/12/08/why-metcalfes-law-does-not-apply-to-online-communities/)" rel="nofollow">(</a><a href="http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/12/08/why-metcalfes-law-does-not-apply-to-online-communities/" rel="nofollow">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/12/08/why-metcalfes-law-does-not-apply-to-online-communities/</a>) but the network effect is still powerful if people are well connected and engaged.  That&#039;s the battle G+ will face imo because people left MySpace for Facebook because they weren&#039;t happy at MySpace so that motivated them to go to all that effort.  Right now I&#039;m not sure people are very unhappy with Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn et al.  The only reason people are using G+ is that they don&#039;t want to miss out. </p>
<p>The interesting point will be how desperate Google get if that situation continues.  You&#039;d have to think after they&#039;ve ditched Wave and Buzz that if G+ were to fall that&#039;d be the end of their adventures into social.  They&#039;re just not gonna let this one wither away. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NickBlack01</title>
		<link>http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/2011/11/02/is-google-in-danger-of-following-the-microsoft-path/#comment-21663</link>
		<dc:creator>NickBlack01</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2011 07:20:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adigaskell.org/blog/?p=508#comment-21663</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you&#039;re right Alex.  So far I&#039;ve not done anything at all on Google+ because it simply doesn&#039;t interest me at all, so it&#039;s been pretty easy to ignore any of the promotional stuff Google have done for the site. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#039;re right Alex.  So far I&#039;ve not done anything at all on Google+ because it simply doesn&#039;t interest me at all, so it&#039;s been pretty easy to ignore any of the promotional stuff Google have done for the site. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
